UGC makes affiliation rules tough for
tech colleges
NEW DELHI
:
The
technical
education institutions in the country will now have to
face relatively tougher rules for university
affiliation.
This follows the Supreme Court decision in
Association of Management of
Private Colleges vs All India Council for Technical
Education & others
delivered on April 25, 2013.
According to the new affiliation rules --
UGC Regulations 2014 --
finalized by the University Grants Commission (UGC)
recently both the old and the new engineering
colleges would have to produce complete information
about building and staff on the affidavit to be
considered for an affiliation.
Called as the UGC [Affiliation of colleges offering
technical education by universities] Regulations, 2014
the new rules make it mandatory for the new colleges to
deposit Rs 1 crore for 10 years in the university
account and Rs 30 lakh as ‘security fund’.
The
UGC [Affiliation of colleges offering technical
education by universities] Regulations, 2014 would be
effective from the 2014-15 academic session.
The
universities would have to ensure compulsory
accreditation from the NSC and its programmes from NBA
to the colleges, according to the UGC Regulations 2014
to be notified soon.
According to the UGC, the university has to be most
cautious and vigilant while giving affiliation. A new
college can be given affiliation with a condition that
it has committed to give related application for NBA
evaluation within six months.
Old
colleges should also submit application for
accreditation from the NASE or the NBA within six months
to six years. The Commission said that a university
should have to submit a compliance report every year to
it regarding all affiliated colleges. The report would
be uploaded on the website of the university. The UGC
will take action against universities for non-compliance
of its rules.
The
Vivekananda Technical University has asked all the
institutions, which have applied for affiliation for the
year 2014-15, to submit their reports regarding
building, infrastructure and human resources by April 4
compulsorily.
The
affiliation fee has also been fixed for the colleges.
The fee for minority institutions will be Rs 2 lakh and
for other institutions Rs 3 lakh. For extension of
affiliation, the fee will be Rs 75,000 for minority
institutions and for other institutions Rs 1 lakh. The
late fee will be Rs 2 lakh.
Technical and engineering colleges have to deposit Rs 1
crore fund for affiliation, whereas, for pharmacy,
architecture and MCA, the amount would Rs 50 lakh each.
Besides, the engineering colleges have to deposit Rs 30
lakh as security fund, whereas, it would be Rs 15 lakh
each for others.
The
University Executive Council will take decision
regarding affiliation. The new rules have caused a
flutter among the operators of old and new colleges.
Many old colleges neither have sufficient building, nor
staff. Now, as all information has to be given in the
affidavit, the danger of action is looming large on
giving wrong information.
PM tells UGC to address
faculty crunch problem
From Our Correspondent
NEW DELHI : Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said
quality in higher education in general remains a huge
concern as even India’s premier institutions do not
figure among the best in the world.
Addressing the diamond jubilee celebrations of the
University Grants Commission (UGC) here on December 28
he said that the shortage of faculty and promotion of
research, strengthening of the university-industry
interface and higher allocation of resources are some of
the major challenges in higher education that require
attention.
The Prime Minister asked UGC to play the role of a
national think tank for the promotion of higher
education in the country.
Dr Singh appreciated the role of UGC as a principal
regulator of higher education in the country.
He said the Government has put unprecedented emphasis on
education at all level in the last ten years. Giving
details of the expansion in the Higher Education in this
period, the Prime Minister said, Gross Enrolment Ratio
has gone up from 11% in 2005-06 to 19.4% i 2010-11.
Twenty three Central Universities, 7 IIMs, 9 IITs, 10
NITs and 4 IIITs have been set up by the Central
Government.
Highlighting the role that
the recently launched Rashtriya Uchttar Shiksha Abhiyan
(RUSA) will play in promoting Higher Education in the
Country, Dr. Singh said that the scheme aims to create
278 new universities and 388 new colleges and to convert
266 colleges to Model Degree Colleges by the end of the
current five year plan ending 2017. The scheme will also
provide infrastructure grants to 286 state universities
and 8500 state colleges
Enumerating the challenges in the Higher Education , the
Prime Minister who was himself the Chairman of the UGC
in 1991, Dr. Singh said quality in general remains a
huge concern that even our premier institutions do not
figure among the best in the world. Shortage of faculty
and promotion of research , strengthening of the
university-industry interface and higher allocation of
resources are the areas which require attention.
The Prime Minister also
announced new awards in the name of Pandit Jawahar Lal
Nehru for individual excellence in the areas of Science,
Humanities and Social Sciences, Technology, Fine Arts
and Culture.
Speaking on the occasion HRD Minister M. M. Pallam Raju
said that the UGC will launch Chairs in the name of the
Indian Nobel laureates including in the name of C.V.
Raman, Rabindra Nath Tagore and Mother Teresa. He said
the government has focused on access. for the weaker
sections of the society and the minorities by giving
scholarships and equal opportunities. He said that the
government is keen to promote Research and more funds
are being earmarked for them. Dr. Raju informed that the
government is keen to give more autonomy to
universities.
The Chairman of the UGC, Dr. Ved Prakash said the
Commission has been given the additional charge of
Distance Education. It is also taking several steps to
ease the constraints caused by the paucity of quality
faculty by engaging Recharge Programs and appointing
contractual faculty.
Beware of teaching
shops, UGC warns students
From Sanjiv Dube
NEW DELHI : With no hope in sight for the passage of
the National Commission for Higher Education and Research
Bill, the University Grants Commission (UGC) and the All
India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) have
started an exercise to make their presence felt.
On June 27 the UGC issued
a circular signed by UGC secretary Akhilesh Gupta
warning students about the ‘misleading’ publicity
campaigns by many private universities. At the
same time, the AICTE has taken a vow to undo the damage
done to it by the startling judgement in the
Association of Management of Private Colleges
vs AICTE case
(Civil Appeal No. 1145 of 2004).
The UGC circular issued to
all universities and state governments warns students
not to get influenced by glossy, attractive
advertisements in newspapers and catchy puffs on the electronic channels.
It has advised students to keep away from unapproved
study centres, off-campus centres, franchisee
institutions, colleges/institutions claiming to be
affiliated to private universities or deemed
universities.
“The private and deemed
universities cannot affiliate any college or institution
for conducting courses leading to award of diplomas,
degrees or other qualifications,” the UGC circular warns.
“The students are advised
not to take admission in these unapproved study centres,
off campus centres, franchise institutions,
colleges/institutions claiming to be affiliated with
private universities or deemed universities,” the
circular added.
The UGC has observed that these private
establishments, claiming to be study centres or learning
centres of different universities, enroll students for
various degree programme and also claim to be
responsible for teaching and conducting examinations.
“The faculty and the infrastructure belong to these
private agencies and the concerned university, except
providing syllabus and teaching materials, has no
mechanism to monitor and maintain the academic standards
of teaching being imparted at these centres. This
blatant compromise with the standards of education has
led to widespread criticism,” the circular says.
The UGC has also clarified that a central or state
government university can conduct courses through its
own departments, its constituent colleges and/or through
its affiliate colleges. A university established or
incorporated by or under the State Act should operate
only within the territorial jurisdiction allotted to it
under the Act.
“No university - whether central, state, private or
deemed - can offer its courses through franchising
arrangement with private coaching institutions, even for
the purpose of conducting courses through long distance.
All universities have been authorised to award only such
degrees as are specified by the UGC,” the circular says.
Similarly, private universities and deemed
universities could not affiliate any college or
institution for conducting courses leading to the award
of its diploma, degree or other qualifications.
All universities have been authorised to award only
such degrees as are specified by the UGC. Importantly,
the M.Phil/Ph.D course
could not be run under distance mode and had to be
conducted on only regular mode by any university,
including private or deemed universities, and as
specified under the Minimum Standards and Procedure for
Award of M.Phil/Ph.D Degree, Regulations 2009.
Deemed universities that have been offering courses
in distance mode before the UGC implemented its
Regulation on Deemed Universities, 2010, can continue to
offer such programmes. But no new deemed university will
be permitted to offer courses in distance mode, the UGC
said.
The UGC is essentially a
toothless body as it cannot award punishment to the
defiant institution, says a seasoned UGC member. “As per
the UGC Act, it can only impose a fine of Rs 1,000 and
issue a public notice against an errant institute. This
penalty is not sufficient,” he said.
There are 158 private universities and 130 deemed
universities, including about 90 private deemed
universities. The ministry has identified 38 private
universities that offer courses in distance mode without
permission from regulatory bodies.
Accreditation must for higher edu institutions
By Sanjiv Dube
NEW DELHI : All
higher educational institutions in the country, except
technical education one, will now have to get accredited
under law.
The law, called the
UGC
(Mandatory Assessment and Accreditation of Higher
Education Institutions) Regulations 2012, were notified
in the official gazette on February 19, and come into
force with immediate effect.
The UGC Regulations 2012
say that all higher education institutions who fail to
comply with the assessment and accreditation clause will
be barred from financial aid granted by the UGC or the
Ministry of Human Resource Development but says nothing
of the private institutions who do not take or aspire to
take any financial aid from the government. Nor do the
Regulations say anything about institutions like the
Indian Institute of Planning and Management (IIPM) who
blatantly defy the UGC and the All India Council for
Technical Education (AICTE).
The Regulation require that all higher education
institutions (expect technical education colleges
governed by the AICTE) apply for accreditation within a
period of six months to the accreditation agencies
namely the National Assessment and Accreditation
Council, the National Board of Accreditation, and the
National Accreditation Board currently recognised by the UGC.
The Regulations say that all institutions which have been in existence for six
years or from where two batches of students have passed
out (whichever is earlier) will need to seek
accreditation within this stipulated time. Those that
haven’t yet completed these criteria must apply within
six months of completing six years of operation or
passing out of two batches apply for accreditation.
The Regulations, says the notification, seeks to ensure that students can make
informed choices about academic courses, institutions
can raise quality and seek international recognition for
which benchmarking is necessary. Hitherto, accreditation
was voluntary in India and less than 10 per cent of all
institutions are accredited.
The regulations will be applicable to all 44 Central
universities,; about 300 state universities, over 100
deemed universities and over
33,000 colleges of which 6,000 are UGC funded.
UGC checks 53 pvt
varsities, finds only 5 'in order'
NEW DELHI : Human Resource Development (HRD)
Minister M.M.
Pallam Raju told Rajya Sabha on December 14, 2013 that
only five out of 53 private universities inspected by
the University Grants Commission (UGC) were found to be
in order.
He said 53 of the total 145 private universities were
inspected while replying to supplementaries during the
question hour in the Rajya Sabha.
"Fifty-three universities were inspected to see how many
were following UGC norms... five of these were found in
order, and came clear," Raju said.
"Once we get some complaint, we inspect the university.
We give them some time to rectify, but if even after
that they do not follow regulations, they are asked to
close," he said.
The minister added that the UGC, which looks after all
non-technical education, had no power to shut down
private universities. The UGC can only direct them to
close courses against which complaints have been
received, he explained.
Raju added that the passage of two pending bills in
parliament, Educational Tribunal Bill and National
Accreditation Regulatory Authority (NARA) for Higher
Educational Institutions Bill, would help in further
regulating private universities.
"I take this opportunity to urge the members to pass the
bill for setting up a education tribunal and another one
for an accreditation authority," Raju said.
The minister also accepted that there were weaknesses in
the UGC and the government was trying to strengthen it.
UGC sets norms for tie-ups with foreign varsities
NEW DELHI : The University Grants Commission
(Promotion and Maintenance of Standards of Academic
Collaboration between Indian and Foreign educational
Institutions) Regulations, 2012 approved in June will
ensure that academic collaboration between Indian and
foreign educational institutes followed the highest
standards.
The regulations mandate that only institutes graded ‘A’
by the National Board of Accreditation or the National
Assessment and Accreditation Council can
collaborate with foreign institutes, which, in turn,
must figure in the list of top 500 global educational
institutes, as ranked by the Times Higher
Education Rankings or the Shanghai Rankings.
Students will not only get a degree from the Indian
institute where they are enrolled but also from the
collaborating foreign institute, if it is inclined to
give one. No programme of study and research shall be
offered which is against national security and
territorial integrity of India.
The two institutions (Indian and its foreign
collaborator) will have to enter into an agreement which
will have to be approved by the UGC before it is
implemented. The approval will be valid for 5 years and
the Commission may review the progress made and
periodically inform the agencies concerned about the
results of such a review. After the expiry of this
period, the UGC may extend or withdraw the approval or
impose such other conditions for extension, as may deem
fit. The regulations make clear that no franchise
arrangement will be allowed.
Existing tie-ups through the Indian institutions will
have six months to meet the new eligibility criteria. In
case they fail to do so, they will have to
terminate the agreements. Institutions that refuse to
comply with the new regulations can lose UGC funding,
de-recognition in case of a deemed university, and
public notices announcing the ineligibility of the
institution to enter into collaborations with foreign
partners.
Disputes arising in relation to collaboration will be
settled as per Indian laws.
As per a 2006 study by the Association of Indian
Universities, over 340 institutes were offering courses
in collaboration with foreign institutes. The UGC
regulations seek to bring some order in area to protect
students by ensuring that only genuine academic
collaborations are encouraged.
|
